
The picture had one positive aspect, it made me very curious about all the historical facts that it did not bother with. I ordered the book the film's based on, "Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire" by Amanda Foreman. It's actually a lot juicier than the movie, which is a sanitized, streamlined interpretation with its eye very much on the story of Charles and Di. For the sake of analogy, it compromised the character of the Duchess, who had a lot more spunk & imagination & brain than Diana.
Harper Collin’s synopsis of Foreman's book:
"Sex, intrigue and adultery in the world of high politics and huge wealth in late eighteenth-century England. Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire was one of the most flamboyant and influential women of the eighteenth century. The great-great-great-great aunt of Diana, Princess of Wales, she was variously a compulsive gambler, a political savante and operator of the highest order, a drug addict, an adulteress and the darling of the common people. This authoritative, utterly absorbing book presents a mesmerizing picture of a fascinating world of political and sexual intrigues, grand houses, huge parties, glamour and great wealth -- always on the edge of being squandered by the excesses and scandals of individuals."
No comments:
Post a Comment